Game Week Articles & Interviews
Re: #1 EWU vs. #30 Sac State
Just a pet peeve thing for me, I realize you won't care.
I wish we would stop "ranking" teams past 25. Where does it end? #2 JMU vs. #112 Georgia State in two weeks would look better just because of number signs.
Carry on.
Re: #1 EWU vs. #30 Sac State
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jmufan999
Just a pet peeve thing for me, I realize you won't care.
I wish we would stop "ranking" teams past 25. Where does it end? #2 JMU vs. #112 Georgia State in two weeks would look better just because of number signs.
Carry on.
Sac State is on the bubble, and has a case to be ranked. 5-2 with an FBS win, and an FBS loss. I cut it off at 30. xcoffeex
Re: #1 EWU vs. #30 Sac State
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Screamin_Eagle174
Sac State is on the bubble, and has a case to be ranked. 5-2 with an FBS win, and an FBS loss. I cut it off at 30. xcoffeex
I think you should cut it off at 37, it's only slightly more random.
Re: #1 EWU vs. #30 Sac State
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jmufan999
I think you should cut it off at 37, it's only slightly more random.
I legit lol'd
Re: #1 EWU vs. #30 Sac State
Quote:
Originally Posted by
DSUrocks07
I legit lol'd
East Coast humor... xsmhx
Re: #1 EWU vs. #30 Sac State
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jmufan999
Just a pet peeve thing for me, I realize you won't care.
I wish we would stop "ranking" teams past 25. Where does it end? #2 JMU vs. #112 Georgia State in two weeks would look better just because of number signs.
Carry on.
Quote:
Originally Posted by
jmufan999
I think you should cut it off at 37, it's only slightly more random.
You didn't have a problem with this thread regarding #1 v #33 - http://www.anygivensaturday.com/show...-Indiana-State. Guess the threshold for your pet peevity went from 37 to 29 this week? troll...
Re: #1 EWU vs. #30 Sac State
Quote:
Originally Posted by
Screamin_Eagle174
East Coast humor... xsmhx
I'm with them.xcoffeex
Re: #1 EWU vs. #30 Sac State
Quote:
Originally Posted by
MSUBobcat
You should consider that it's possible that jmufan saw that last week was a lakesbison started thread and something ridiculous like including a sub 25 ranking would be expected from lakes, but not for others to follow suit. It's just like in the real world. "Special needs" people are held to much lower standards than those that aren't mentally disadvantaged. When Lakes does something dumb and unnecessary, it's expected, understood, or ignored. There's no need for the rest of us to do the same things, though.