PDA

View Full Version : GPI through 11/7



barechestcat
November 7th, 2005, 10:14 PM
http://www.i-aa.org/article.asp?articleid=74018

Now I've got a question that pertains to the playoffs. Does the committee utilize a "quality of wins/losses/schedule" more so then simply win/loss record? I've seen some, including Ralph, mention that the GPI has always been very accurate in relation to who makes the playoffs vs its final 16.

What say you?

McNeese75
November 7th, 2005, 10:45 PM
It appears the SFA win this past week bumped the SLC ahead of the GWFC. Way to go Jacks!! :D

umassfan
November 7th, 2005, 10:52 PM
This right here says UMass would be a seed if the season ended today. If we win out it will even better our case. No way Hampton gets a seed with their GPI ranked 13th.

Cincy App
November 8th, 2005, 05:49 AM
Conference Ranking Detail

Conference Rank
Rank, Conference (Average Rating)
Atlantic 10 Conference (30.29)
Southland Conference (30.81)
Great West Football Conference (31.48)
Ivy League (39.95)
Patriot League (49.54)
Mid-Eastern Athletic Conference (54.25)
Ohio Valley Conference (55.43)
Big South Conference (58.11)
Southwestern Athletic Conference (64.78)
Pioneer Football League (70.63)
Northeast Conference (75.21)
Metro-Atlantic Athletic Conference (78.67)

Ralph, you may want to edit the conference rankings as the A-10 is currently 4th. The Big Sky, Southern, and Gateway are 1-2-3, in that order. Thanks for publishing.

Cincy App
November 8th, 2005, 05:53 AM
TOP 25
Rank. Team (Total)
14T. Illinois St (15.67)
16. W Kentucky (17.56)
17. Richmond (17.78)
18. UC Davis (19.00)
19. Nicholls St (20.89)
20. Coastal Car (21.00)
21. E Washington (21.44)
22. Youngstown St (21.56)
23. Princeton (21.67)
24. Portland St (22.33)
25. Lehigh (22.78)


Interesting to see a potential 7-4 team in Illinois State ahead of teams like Richmond and Coastal Carolina. We'll see how that plays out! Also, Montana State (currently #9) would still be highly ranked in the GPI if they beat EWU and lose to UM. Hmmm.

bluehenbillk
November 8th, 2005, 07:22 AM
You guys put way too much credence in a system that has ruined 1-A football. Let it go.

AppGuy04
November 8th, 2005, 07:34 AM
You guys put way too much credence in a system that has ruined 1-A football. Let it go.

its a guage, not a be-all end-all like the BCS, we still have humans

GannonFan
November 8th, 2005, 08:54 AM
This right here says UMass would be a seed if the season ended today. If we win out it will even better our case. No way Hampton gets a seed with their GPI ranked 13th.

You're going to be sorely disappointed - Hampton's getting a seed. A playoff team from last year goes undefeated this year, especially in a year with only one really dominant team (UNH) and the rest of IAA sprinkled with poor records, and are highly ranked in the polls, is getting a seed. Granted, it may be a 3 or 4 seed, but it'll be a seed. As for UMass getting a seed, there would only be two left, and Montana, if it ended today, would get one. The other one would be up for grabs between UMass, Texas St, Furman, and Southern Illinois. If it were those 4 teams I doubt the A10 would get a second seed and both Texas St and SIU have the same record that UMass has but with a IA loss - a seed if it ended today would be doubtful for UMass. UMass wins out and some of these teams trip then it would be more probable.

OL FU
November 8th, 2005, 09:02 AM
I know (well Ralph told me :) and I believe him :confused: :D ) that the GPI is a sucessful indicator of which teams get in the playoffs. But I don't think he ever said it was an indicator of who would get seeded. Is this correct?

AppGuy04
November 8th, 2005, 09:35 AM
I know (well Ralph told me :) and I believe him :confused: :D ) that the GPI is a sucessful indicator of which teams get in the playoffs. But I don't think he ever said it was an indicator of who would get seeded. Is this correct?

correct