SLC Pick'em: Week 10

[BEAR]

Last week's results

UCA 45 at SLU 10
HBU 24 at Lamar 17
SFA 42 at UIW 19
Nicholls 31 at NWST 14
Texas Southern 17 at SHSU 66
ACU 14 at McNeese 33

No surprise: Sammy rolls.
Uptick: McNeese wins again.
Surprise: Lamar lost? to HBU?!

This week's games:

Lamar at Nicholls
UCA at SFA
SLU at UIW
NWST at ACU
HBU at UTEP
McNeese at SHSU

Race to 7 division I wins:

7 accomplished:
UCA- Games left- SFA, Nicholls, SHSU
SHSU- Games left- McNeese, NWST, UCA

Needs to win last 3 games to get to 7:
Nicholls- Games left- Lamar, UCA, SLU
SLU- Games left- UIW, ACU, Nicholls

Can't reach 7 wins: Out of playoffs
McNeese
SFA
Lamar
HBU
UIW
ACU
NWST


Conference standings:




SCHOOL
CONF
OVERALL


Sam Houston State (http://www.southland.org/schedule.aspx?schedule=739)
6-0
8-0


Central Arkansas (http://www.southland.org/schedule.aspx?schedule=743)
6-0
7-1


Nicholls (http://www.southland.org/schedule.aspx?schedule=748)
4-2
4-4


Southeastern La. (http://www.southland.org/schedule.aspx?schedule=750)
4-2
4-4


McNeese (http://www.southland.org/schedule.aspx?schedule=747)
4-3
5-4


Stephen F. Austin (http://www.southland.org/schedule.aspx?schedule=736)
3-3
4-4


Lamar (http://www.southland.org/schedule.aspx?schedule=746)
3-3
3-5


Houston Baptist (http://www.southland.org/schedule.aspx?schedule=744)
2-4
3-5


UIW (http://www.southland.org/schedule.aspx?schedule=745) *
1-5
1-7


Abilene Christian (http://www.southland.org/schedule.aspx?schedule=734) *
1-6
1-8


Northwestern State (http://www.southland.org/schedule.aspx?schedule=741)
0-6
1-7


* ineligible for regular-season championship and postseason play
FULL STANDINGS (http://www.southland.org/standings.aspx?path=football&standings=36)

[BEAR]

Lamar at Nicholls- Lamar is just too beat up. Colonels by 7.
UCA at SFA- Bears bring a solid D. SFA gives up massive yards and points per game. Bears by 21.
SLU at UIW- Lions bounce back for a 14 point win.
NWST at ACU- ACU wins by 3.
HBU at UTEP- UTEP by 14.
McNeese at SHSU- While I want a cowboy upset, Kats are playing solid ball. Kats by 28.

[blackfordpu]

Kats are playing good ball but this is a revenge game for the cowboys. I expect it to be closer than that. I agree with pretty much everything else.

Sent from my HTC One A9 using Tapatalk

[TheRevSFA]

Bear, playoff eligibility is 7 wins, 6 division one wins. SFA technically is eligible. They wouldn't get an at large bid if they won out, but helping you for accuracy

[BEAR]

Kats are playing good ball but this is a revenge game for the cowboys. I expect it to be closer than that. I agree with pretty much everything else.

Sent from my HTC One A9 using Tapatalk

While I don't doubt they want revenge, Sam resembles UCA this year in talent, and it wasn't close in Lake Charles. Unless Kat fans are hiding a secret.....xlolx

[BEAR]

Bear, playoff eligibility is 7 wins, 6 division one wins. SFA technically is eligible. They wouldn't get an at large bid if they won out, but helping you for accuracy

Yes technically 6 wins but even UCA had 7 DI wins last year and was left out because the SLC has to have extraordinary happenings in the other conferences to get 3 in. Kinda of out of our control. Although a couple of years ago we got 3 in two years in a row. So who knows. But this year it looks like 2 teams only.

[Katfan]

Nichols by 10
UCA by 28
SLU by 3
ACU by 1
UTEP by 14
SHSU by 14

[McNeese75]

Lamar at Nicholls =21
UCA -17 at SFA
SLU-10 at UIW
NWST-7 at ACU
HBU at UTEP-35
McNeese at SHSU-80

[blackfordpu]

Lamar at Nicholls =21
UCA -17 at SFA
SLU-10 at UIW
NWST-7 at ACU
HBU at UTEP-35
McNeese at SHSU-80

What? 80?

Sent from my HTC One A9 using Tapatalk

[McNeese75]

You know y'all like to hang 80. Here is your chance xdrunkyx

[blackfordpu]

You really think your team is that bad? This game scares the hell out of me.

Sent from my HTC One A9 using Tapatalk

[McNeese75]

You really think your team is that bad? This game scares the hell out of me.

Sent from my HTC One A9 using Tapatalk

Just ask the UCA fans. Of course I think you will hang 60 or more on them so

[Daytripper]

Lamar at Nicholls - Lamar is circling the drain - Nicholls by 21
UCA at SFA - Upset special? Nah. SFA keeps it close - UCA by 9
SLU at UIW - UIW continues to improve, wins by 3
NWST at ACU - ACU by 10
HBU at UTEP - UTEP by 24
McNeese at SHSU - Opposite of norm for Kats - Close in first half, break it open in the second half. SHSU by 21

[Katfan]

Lamar at Nicholls =21
UCA -17 at SFA
SLU-10 at UIW
NWST-7 at ACU
HBU at UTEP-35
McNeese at SHSU-80
There is no way we would score 80, even if we could and even if we did, we would give up 35.

[Sammy94]

Lamar at Nicholls by 14
UCA at SFA by 3
SLU at UIW by 13
NWST at ACU by 10
HBU at UTEP by 24
McNeese at SHSU by 17

[TheRevSFA]

My non-pulitzer prize winning write up should be posted this afternoon, but I honestly only wanted to write about SFA/UCA and Sam/McNeese..

[McCowboys]

You really think your team is that bad? This game scares the hell out of me.

Sent from my HTC One A9 using Tapatalk

I almost cried when the Big 12 said they would not expand. I was hoping they would take the Bearkats NOW!

[Daytripper]

My non-pulitzer prize winning write up should be posted this afternoon, but I honestly only wanted to write about SFA/UCA and Sam/McNeese..

The only other team that has a fan that posts here is Nicholls. Cover Sam, SFA, UCA, McNeese, ACU and Nicholls in your write-up and you are golden.

[TheRevSFA]

The only other team that has a fan that posts here is Nicholls. Cover Sam, SFA, UCA, McNeese, ACU and Nicholls in your write-up and you are golden.

I mean no offense to Catatonic but NSULA vs ACU? A team with zero wins vs D1 competition vs a team with only one D1 win?

The good news here is that someone will win that game...

[Daytripper]

I mean no offense to Catatonic but NSULA vs ACU? A team with zero wins vs D1 competition vs a team with only one D1 win?

The good news here is that someone will win that game...

Yeah, there might not be an uglier game in the country than NWST v. ACU.

[milleniumkat]

Lamar at Nicholls =21
UCA -17 at SFA
SLU-10 at UIW
NWST-7 at ACU
HBU at UTEP-35
McNeese at SHSU-80

Sandbag warning! Alert! Alert! Are you doing this to be able to say "Hey, we lost by 2 scores, we overachieved?"

Just asking for Tripod.

[milleniumkat]

sorry. phone crash. duplicate post.

[Catatonic]

I mean no offense to Catatonic but NSULA vs ACU? A team with zero wins vs D1 competition vs a team with only one D1 win?

The good news here is that someone will win that game...

No offense taken. The suckage is strong coming out of Abilene.

[BEAR]

Lamar at Nicholls by 14
UCA at SFA by 3
SLU at UIW by 13
NWST at ACU by 10
HBU at UTEP by 24
McNeese at SHSU by 17


Dominated teams on the road by an average of 35 points. That's always a plus.



Only if you aren't SHSU http://www.anygivensaturday.com/images/smilies/biggrin2.png


https://i.imgflip.com/1dabfm.jpg

[Sammy94]

There is no way we would score 80

We could but Keeler wouldn't do it. I am just hoping we get to see the starters play a whole game soon. Most likely won't be against this McNeese team but probably for UCA, if not just for a playoff warm up. Could you imagine the numbers Briscoe could have put up if he played entire games?

[SFA 93]

These are the freshmen or r/fr. who have played at some point this season for the Jacks.

* Starting or have started at some point

QB:#10 Jake Blumrick 6-2; 202 (R/Fr.)
RB:#32 Jamall Shaw 5-11; 205 (Fr.)
WR:#80 Tamrick Pace 6-3; 192 (Fr.) * Leads the team in receiving yards and TDs (REC:34;YDS:492;TD:6)
WR:#82 Cody Williams 6-3; 205 (Fr.)
WR:#89 Kiki Hill 6-2; 216 (R/Fr.) *
WR:#81 Jonathan Sam 6-2; 205 (R/Fr.)
WR:#26 Khalil Lacy 6-0; 165 (Fr.)
OL:#76 Cooper Williams 6-4; 277 (Fr.) *
OL:#64 Travis Lock 6-3; 278 (R/Fr.) *
OL:#52 A.J. Brown 6-2; 305 (R/Fr.) *
K:#36 Storm Ruiz 5-10; 160 (R/Fr.) *
DE:#98 Jack Martin 6-4; 238 (R/Fr.)
DE:#57 Gary Sampson 6-3; 240 (R/Fr.)
DT:#55 Paul Hill 6-1; 284 (R/Fr.)
LB:#54 Spencer Choka 6-0; 238 (R/Fr.)
LB:#43 Anthony Jacobs 5-11; 237 (R/Fr.)
LB:#42 Teddy Britton 5-11; 219 (R/Fr.)
S:#33 Alize Ward 5-10; 203 (R/Fr.) *
S:#39 Trey Ramos 6-0; 175 (Fr.)
S:#47 Hunter Cabral 5-9; 185 (Fr.)
CB:#24 Alex Gregory 6-1; 180 (Fr.)

Still Injured or banged up with limited to no action…

* Starter

WR:#5 Justice Liggins 6-1; 210 (Sr.) *
WR:#89 Kiki Hill 6-2; 216 (R/Fr.) *
TE:#87 Nick Jones 6-4; 248 (Jr.) *
OL:#72 Travis Wiggins 6-3; 300 (Sr.) *
OL:#76 Cooper Williams 6-4; 277 (Fr.) *
OL:#71 Devonte Jones 6-2; 305 (So.)
S:#37 Ahmad Muhammad 6-0; 196 (Jr.) *
CB:#11 Aaron Foy 5-11; 184 (Jr.) *
CB:#1 Tre Rosser 5-11; 185 (Sr.)

Left the Team during the season for personal reasons

WR:#88 Aaron Piper 5-9; 186 (Jr.)
WR:#19 Robert Sylvester 6-0; 193 (Jr.)
WR:#22 Thomas Nolley 6-3; 190 (Fr.)
CB:#31 Zach Hall 5-11; 175 (Fr.)
OL:#76 Jake Wallace 6-0; 278 (Sr.)

Probable Starters

QB:#2 Zach Conque 6-6; 237 (Sr.) ATT:248;CMP:111;CP%:.45%;YDS:1,270;TD:10;INT:4/RTD:8
Career: ATT:936;CMP:537;CP%:.57%;YDS:5936;TD:41;INT:21/R:368;YDS:1397;TD:32;T:7,333;TD:73

RB:#7 Loren Easly 5-11; 205 (So.) ATT:63;YDS:421;AVG:6.7;TD:5/REC:4;YDS:43;TD:0

WR:#80 Tamrick Pace 6-3; 192 (Fr.) REC:34;YDS:492;TD:6
WR:#9 Trae Hart 5-11; 175 (Jr.) REC:34;YDS:447;TD:2/PRTD:1

WR:#82 Cody Williams 6-3; 205 (Fr.) REC:6;YDS:41;TD:0

TE:#84 Lucas Askew 6-5; 220 (So.) REC:3;YDS:30;TD:0

OL:#79 Josh Keith 6-7; 318 (Jr.)
OL:#60 Shane Roberson 6-2; 304 (Jr.)
OL:#68 Anthony Pullins 6-3; 300 (Sr.)
OL:#52 A.J. Brown 6-2; 305 (R/Fr.)
OL:#64 Travis Lock 6-3; 278 (R/Fr.)

DE:#97 Kedrick Harrison 6-2; 246 (Sr.) TKL:26;TFL:10.5;SCK:7.5;FF:1;FR:0;PBU:1;INT:0;QBH: 4
DT:#73 Shaq Anderson 6-1; 305 (So.) TKL:25;TFL:2.0;SCK:1.5;FF:0;FR:0;PBU:0;INT:0;QBH:3
DT:#93 Lamont Alexander 6-3; 300 (So.) TKL:25;TFL:0.0;SCK:0.0;FF:0;FR:0;PBU:0;INT:0;QBH:0
DE:#13 John Franklin 6-4; 278 (Jr.) TKL:22;TFL:10.5;SCK:6.0;FF:3;FR:2;PBU:0;INT:0;QBH: 7

LB:#4 George Stone III 6-1; 225 (Sr.) TKL:58;TFL:6.5;SCK:1.0;FF:0;FR:1;PBU:4;INT:2;QBH:0 ;TD:1
LB:#49 Price Miller 6-1; 228 (Sr.) TKL:55;TFL:2.0;SCK:0.0;FF:1;FR:1;PBU:3;INT:2;QBH:1
S:#33 Alize Ward 5-10; 203 (R/Fr.) TKL:38;TFL:1.5;SCK:0.0;FF:0;FR:0;PBU:3;INT:1;QBH:2

CB:#8 Trent Perriman 5-11; 184 (Jr.) TKL:23;TFL:0.0;SCK:0.0;FF:0;FR:1;PBU:9;INT:0;QBH:0
S:#14 Patrick Martin 5-9; 186 (Sr.) TKL:37;TFL:0.5;SCK:0.0;FF:1;FR:1;PBU:0;INT:0;QBH:0
S:#28 Marion Walls 5-10; 196 (Jr.) TKL:44;TFL:1.5;SCK:0.0;FF:1;FR:0;PBU:3;INT:0;QBH:1
CB:#20 Tarrin Mitchell 5-10; 186 (So.) TKL:15;TFL:0.0;SCK:0.0;FF:0;FR:0;PBU:2;INT:0;QBH:0

[Katfan]

We could but Keeler wouldn't do it. I am just hoping we get to see the starters play a whole game soon. Most likely won't be against this McNeese team but probably for UCA, if not just for a playoff warm up. Could you imagine the numbers Briscoe could have put up if he played entire games?
That's why I said would not could

[Katfan]

These are the freshmen or r/fr. who have played at some point this season for the Jacks.

* Starting or have started at some point

QB:#10 Jake Blumrick 6-2; 202 (R/Fr.)
RB:#32 Jamall Shaw 5-11; 205 (Fr.)
WR:#80 Tamrick Pace 6-3; 192 (Fr.) * Leads the team in receiving yards and TDs (REC:34;YDS:492;TD:6)
WR:#82 Cody Williams 6-3; 205 (Fr.)
WR:#89 Kiki Hill 6-2; 216 (R/Fr.) *
WR:#81 Jonathan Sam 6-2; 205 (R/Fr.)
WR:#26 Khalil Lacy 6-0; 165 (Fr.)
OL:#76 Cooper Williams 6-4; 277 (Fr.) *
OL:#64 Travis Lock 6-3; 278 (R/Fr.) *
OL:#52 A.J. Brown 6-2; 305 (R/Fr.) *
K:#36 Storm Ruiz 5-10; 160 (R/Fr.) *
DE:#98 Jack Martin 6-4; 238 (R/Fr.)
DE:#57 Gary Sampson 6-3; 240 (R/Fr.)
DT:#55 Paul Hill 6-1; 284 (R/Fr.)
LB:#54 Spencer Choka 6-0; 238 (R/Fr.)
LB:#43 Anthony Jacobs 5-11; 237 (R/Fr.)
LB:#42 Teddy Britton 5-11; 219 (R/Fr.)
S:#33 Alize Ward 5-10; 203 (R/Fr.) *
S:#39 Trey Ramos 6-0; 175 (Fr.)
S:#47 Hunter Cabral 5-9; 185 (Fr.)
CB:#24 Alex Gregory 6-1; 180 (Fr.)

Still Injured or banged up with limited to no action…

* Starter

WR:#5 Justice Liggins 6-1; 210 (Sr.) *
WR:#89 Kiki Hill 6-2; 216 (R/Fr.) *
TE:#87 Nick Jones 6-4; 248 (Jr.) *
OL:#72 Travis Wiggins 6-3; 300 (Sr.) *
OL:#76 Cooper Williams 6-4; 277 (Fr.) *
OL:#71 Devonte Jones 6-2; 305 (So.)
S:#37 Ahmad Muhammad 6-0; 196 (Jr.) *
CB:#11 Aaron Foy 5-11; 184 (Jr.) *
CB:#1 Tre Rosser 5-11; 185 (Sr.)

Left the Team during the season for personal reasons

WR:#88 Aaron Piper 5-9; 186 (Jr.)
WR:#19 Robert Sylvester 6-0; 193 (Jr.)
WR:#22 Thomas Nolley 6-3; 190 (Fr.)
CB:#31 Zach Hall 5-11; 175 (Fr.)
OL:#76 Jake Wallace 6-0; 278 (Sr.)

Probable Starters

QB:#2 Zach Conque 6-6; 237 (Sr.) ATT:248;CMP:111;CP%:.45%;YDS:1,270;TD:10;INT:4/RTD:8
Career: ATT:936;CMP:537;CP%:.57%;YDS:5936;TD:41;INT:21/R:368;YDS:1397;TD:32;T:7,333;TD:73

RB:#7 Loren Easly 5-11; 205 (So.) ATT:63;YDS:421;AVG:6.7;TD:5/REC:4;YDS:43;TD:0

WR:#80 Tamrick Pace 6-3; 192 (Fr.) REC:34;YDS:492;TD:6
WR:#9 Trae Hart 5-11; 175 (Jr.) REC:34;YDS:447;TD:2/PRTD:1

WR:#82 Cody Williams 6-3; 205 (Fr.) REC:6;YDS:41;TD:0

TE:#84 Lucas Askew 6-5; 220 (So.) REC:3;YDS:30;TD:0

OL:#79 Josh Keith 6-7; 318 (Jr.)
OL:#60 Shane Roberson 6-2; 304 (Jr.)
OL:#68 Anthony Pullins 6-3; 300 (Sr.)
OL:#52 A.J. Brown 6-2; 305 (R/Fr.)
OL:#64 Travis Lock 6-3; 278 (R/Fr.)

DE:#97 Kedrick Harrison 6-2; 246 (Sr.) TKL:26;TFL:10.5;SCK:7.5;FF:1;FR:0;PBU:1;INT:0;QBH: 4
DT:#73 Shaq Anderson 6-1; 305 (So.) TKL:25;TFL:2.0;SCK:1.5;FF:0;FR:0;PBU:0;INT:0;QBH:3
DT:#93 Lamont Alexander 6-3; 300 (So.) TKL:25;TFL:0.0;SCK:0.0;FF:0;FR:0;PBU:0;INT:0;QBH:0
DE:#13 John Franklin 6-4; 278 (Jr.) TKL:22;TFL:10.5;SCK:6.0;FF:3;FR:2;PBU:0;INT:0;QBH: 7

LB:#4 George Stone III 6-1; 225 (Sr.) TKL:58;TFL:6.5;SCK:1.0;FF:0;FR:1;PBU:4;INT:2;QBH:0 ;TD:1
LB:#49 Price Miller 6-1; 228 (Sr.) TKL:55;TFL:2.0;SCK:0.0;FF:1;FR:1;PBU:3;INT:2;QBH:1
S:#33 Alize Ward 5-10; 203 (R/Fr.) TKL:38;TFL:1.5;SCK:0.0;FF:0;FR:0;PBU:3;INT:1;QBH:2

CB:#8 Trent Perriman 5-11; 184 (Jr.) TKL:23;TFL:0.0;SCK:0.0;FF:0;FR:1;PBU:9;INT:0;QBH:0
S:#14 Patrick Martin 5-9; 186 (Sr.) TKL:37;TFL:0.5;SCK:0.0;FF:1;FR:1;PBU:0;INT:0;QBH:0
S:#28 Marion Walls 5-10; 196 (Jr.) TKL:44;TFL:1.5;SCK:0.0;FF:1;FR:0;PBU:3;INT:0;QBH:1
CB:#20 Tarrin Mitchell 5-10; 186 (So.) TKL:15;TFL:0.0;SCK:0.0;FF:0;FR:0;PBU:2;INT:0;QBH:0
Looks good for the future. I know you have some big WR. You guys will be back soon

[SFA 93]

Yes, Conque has stated we need to get bigger and the latest recruits are headed that way. He redshirted a few players from the 2016 class and already has 19 and counting in for the 2017 class (of course not signed yet)

redshirted this season

QB:#9 Paten Snell 6-3; 190 (Fr.)
QB:#17 Tyler Ferre’ 6-3; 210 (Fr.)

RB:#29 Josh McGowen 5-9; 190 (Fr.)

WR:#00 Darby Baldwin 6-2; 185 (Fr.) **

OL:#74 Matthew Mora 6-7; 280 (Fr.)
OL:#00 Sigi Mora-Garcia 6-5; 310 (Fr.)
OL:#66 Zach Mack 6-3; 285 (Fr.)
OL:#56 Deion Bennett 6-2; 284 (Fr.)

DE:#95 Malik George 6-3; 220 (Fr.) **
DE:#90 Jerry Blanks 6-2; 242 (Fr.) **

DT:#77 Rayshad Nichols 6-4; 280 (Fr.)
DT:#92 Larron Cox 6-3; 265 (Fr.)

LB:#48 Fre’Zarian Harrison 5-11; 224 (Fr.)

committed for 2017

OL: Connor Haff 6-5; 285
OL: James Price 6-5; 265 **
OL: John Wilkowski 6-6; 245

QB: Colby Kizzie 6-2; 185 ***
QB: Zach Smith 6-2; 190

ATH: Dominic Williams 5-11; 191
RB: Kali Stevens 5-11; 186

WR: Calvin Clater 6-3; 190 **
WR: Dylan Parker 6-4; 190
WR: DeJour Dowell 6-2; 200

DB: Nathan Giles 6-1; 175 **
DB: Davion Thompson 6-1; 185
DB: Joshua Murray 6-0; 175
DB: Grid Isidore 6-1; 170
DB: JJ Dallas 6-0; 200 *** early enrollee from Houston

DE: Desmond Clifton 6-4; 230
DE: Moses Johnson 6-5; 242

DT: Devon Tibbs 6-4; 260 **

LB: Michael McCain 6-2; 200

[milleniumkat]

These are the freshmen or r/fr. who have played at some point this season for the Jacks.

* Starting or have started at some point

QB:#10 Jake Blumrick 6-2; 202 (R/Fr.)
RB:#32 Jamall Shaw 5-11; 205 (Fr.)
WR:#80 Tamrick Pace 6-3; 192 (Fr.) * Leads the team in receiving yards and TDs (REC:34;YDS:492;TD:6)
WR:#82 Cody Williams 6-3; 205 (Fr.)
WR:#89 Kiki Hill 6-2; 216 (R/Fr.) *
WR:#81 Jonathan Sam 6-2; 205 (R/Fr.)
WR:#26 Khalil Lacy 6-0; 165 (Fr.)
OL:#76 Cooper Williams 6-4; 277 (Fr.) *
OL:#64 Travis Lock 6-3; 278 (R/Fr.) *
OL:#52 A.J. Brown 6-2; 305 (R/Fr.) *
K:#36 Storm Ruiz 5-10; 160 (R/Fr.) *
DE:#98 Jack Martin 6-4; 238 (R/Fr.)
DE:#57 Gary Sampson 6-3; 240 (R/Fr.)
DT:#55 Paul Hill 6-1; 284 (R/Fr.)
LB:#54 Spencer Choka 6-0; 238 (R/Fr.)
LB:#43 Anthony Jacobs 5-11; 237 (R/Fr.)
LB:#42 Teddy Britton 5-11; 219 (R/Fr.)
S:#33 Alize Ward 5-10; 203 (R/Fr.) *
S:#39 Trey Ramos 6-0; 175 (Fr.)
S:#47 Hunter Cabral 5-9; 185 (Fr.)
CB:#24 Alex Gregory 6-1; 180 (Fr.)

Still Injured or banged up with limited to no action…

* Starter

WR:#5 Justice Liggins 6-1; 210 (Sr.) *
WR:#89 Kiki Hill 6-2; 216 (R/Fr.) *
TE:#87 Nick Jones 6-4; 248 (Jr.) *
OL:#72 Travis Wiggins 6-3; 300 (Sr.) *
OL:#76 Cooper Williams 6-4; 277 (Fr.) *
OL:#71 Devonte Jones 6-2; 305 (So.)
S:#37 Ahmad Muhammad 6-0; 196 (Jr.) *
CB:#11 Aaron Foy 5-11; 184 (Jr.) *
CB:#1 Tre Rosser 5-11; 185 (Sr.)

Left the Team during the season for personal reasons

WR:#88 Aaron Piper 5-9; 186 (Jr.)
WR:#19 Robert Sylvester 6-0; 193 (Jr.)
WR:#22 Thomas Nolley 6-3; 190 (Fr.)
CB:#31 Zach Hall 5-11; 175 (Fr.)
OL:#76 Jake Wallace 6-0; 278 (Sr.)

Probable Starters

QB:#2 Zach Conque 6-6; 237 (Sr.) ATT:248;CMP:111;CP%:.45%;YDS:1,270;TD:10;INT:4/RTD:8
Career: ATT:936;CMP:537;CP%:.57%;YDS:5936;TD:41;INT:21/R:368;YDS:1397;TD:32;T:7,333;TD:73

RB:#7 Loren Easly 5-11; 205 (So.) ATT:63;YDS:421;AVG:6.7;TD:5/REC:4;YDS:43;TD:0

WR:#80 Tamrick Pace 6-3; 192 (Fr.) REC:34;YDS:492;TD:6
WR:#9 Trae Hart 5-11; 175 (Jr.) REC:34;YDS:447;TD:2/PRTD:1

WR:#82 Cody Williams 6-3; 205 (Fr.) REC:6;YDS:41;TD:0

TE:#84 Lucas Askew 6-5; 220 (So.) REC:3;YDS:30;TD:0

OL:#79 Josh Keith 6-7; 318 (Jr.)
OL:#60 Shane Roberson 6-2; 304 (Jr.)
OL:#68 Anthony Pullins 6-3; 300 (Sr.)
OL:#52 A.J. Brown 6-2; 305 (R/Fr.)
OL:#64 Travis Lock 6-3; 278 (R/Fr.)

DE:#97 Kedrick Harrison 6-2; 246 (Sr.) TKL:26;TFL:10.5;SCK:7.5;FF:1;FR:0;PBU:1;INT:0;QBH: 4
DT:#73 Shaq Anderson 6-1; 305 (So.) TKL:25;TFL:2.0;SCK:1.5;FF:0;FR:0;PBU:0;INT:0;QBH:3
DT:#93 Lamont Alexander 6-3; 300 (So.) TKL:25;TFL:0.0;SCK:0.0;FF:0;FR:0;PBU:0;INT:0;QBH:0
DE:#13 John Franklin 6-4; 278 (Jr.) TKL:22;TFL:10.5;SCK:6.0;FF:3;FR:2;PBU:0;INT:0;QBH: 7

LB:#4 George Stone III 6-1; 225 (Sr.) TKL:58;TFL:6.5;SCK:1.0;FF:0;FR:1;PBU:4;INT:2;QBH:0 ;TD:1
LB:#49 Price Miller 6-1; 228 (Sr.) TKL:55;TFL:2.0;SCK:0.0;FF:1;FR:1;PBU:3;INT:2;QBH:1
S:#33 Alize Ward 5-10; 203 (R/Fr.) TKL:38;TFL:1.5;SCK:0.0;FF:0;FR:0;PBU:3;INT:1;QBH:2

CB:#8 Trent Perriman 5-11; 184 (Jr.) TKL:23;TFL:0.0;SCK:0.0;FF:0;FR:1;PBU:9;INT:0;QBH:0
S:#14 Patrick Martin 5-9; 186 (Sr.) TKL:37;TFL:0.5;SCK:0.0;FF:1;FR:1;PBU:0;INT:0;QBH:0
S:#28 Marion Walls 5-10; 196 (Jr.) TKL:44;TFL:1.5;SCK:0.0;FF:1;FR:0;PBU:3;INT:0;QBH:1
CB:#20 Tarrin Mitchell 5-10; 186 (So.) TKL:15;TFL:0.0;SCK:0.0;FF:0;FR:0;PBU:2;INT:0;QBH:0

Thanks for that.

[Serpentor]

Would it be a dick move to try to beat McNeese by more points then Central Arky??

[milleniumkat]

Would it be a dick move to try to beat McNeese by more points then Central Arky??

Yes. But i'm on board.

Don't think Mcneese was itself that night tho.

[TheRevSFA]

http://thefcswedge.com/slc/slc-week-10-preview/

[BEAR]

http://thefcswedge.com/slc/slc-week-10-preview/

Well done Rev. I know it was tough to pick against the Lumberjacks. Look UCA lost over 30 players last year. UCA fans were hoping for progress toward a title of ANY kind. None of us knew we had a coach that uses 8 rushers and 10 receivers a game. I cant think of one that will be all-conference except maybe Tre Smith. Yes there is talent but they are playing by committee. You will probably see a defense that lost two beasts last year one being Woodard, a defense that might have 8 guys with 5 tackles each instead of one guy with 12 tackles.

[McNeese75]

Would it be a dick move to try to beat McNeese by more points then Central Arky??

Nope, if you can hang 80 do it.... You can bet, If McNeese gets that same chance it will be done with malice. xnodx

[Serpentor]

Nope, if you can hang 80 do it.... You can bet, If McNeese gets that same chance it will be done with malice. xnodx

Fair enough. Then let the best man win, THIS, I COMMAND!

[BEAR]

Interesting comment by Coach Conque on the SLC coaches show..."to be competitive against UCA".

xeyebrowx

He mentioned some players are gone and some are hurt.

But why didn't he say "to beat UCA" ?

Has he already thrown in the towel on this game? xeyebrowx

Or did I hear him wrong...

[Daytripper]

Interesting comment by Coach Conque on the SLC coaches show..."to be competitive against UCA".

xeyebrowx

He mentioned some players are gone and some are hurt.

But why didn't he say "to beat UCA" ?

Has he already thrown in the towel on this game? xeyebrowx

Or did I hear him wrong...

Hedging your bets against a conference foe is not a way to instill confidence in your players.

[BEAR]

Hedging your bets against a conference foe is not a way to instill confidence in your players.

Having heard him here for over a decade when I hear him speak like that he is checked out...which is strange because SFA can beat UCA or they wouldn't play...ANY team has a chance to beat any team.

[Daytripper]

Having heard him here for over a decade when I hear him speak like that he is checked out...which is strange because SFA can beat UCA or they wouldn't play...ANY team has a chance to beat any team.

I was thinking the very same thing. I think he bit off more than he can chew.

[BEAR]

I was thinking the very same thing. I think he bit off more than he can chew.

That sucks for SFA fans. CC caused trouble when he was here and we warned SFA fans he would screw up a good thing they had going. But we were labeled as jealous.

Sad thing is SFA can still beat UCA...probably won't...but still can.

Time for a new coach at SFA.

[McNeese75]

That sucks for SFA fans. CC caused trouble when he was here and we warned SFA fans he would screw up a good thing they had going. But we were labeled as jealous.

Sad thing is SFA can still beat UCA...probably won't...but still can.

Time for a new coach at SFA.

I saw J.C. Harper at my grandson's school this morning eating lunch with his daughter. He is available if SFA is lookin xbangx :D

[BEAR]

I want to know what SFA fans think about all this...

According to their board they are already talking about "is it time for a new coach?"

[Daytripper]

I want to know what SFA fans think about all this...

According to their board they are already talking about "is it time for a new coach?"

I didn't understand this hire in the first place. I think they could have done much better. The SLC is not a hard conference to be successful in. East Texas is within spitting distance of the most fertile recruiting areas in the country.

[BamKat]

I didn't understand this hire in the first place. I think they could have done much better. The SLC is not a hard conference to be successful in. East Texas is within spitting distance of the most fertile recruiting areas in the country.

They thought they out hired Fritz. . Did not work out when he was gone the next week. Lol

I wonder if KC applied to SFA or ole MT?


Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk

[SFA 93]

Last three seasons before Conque.

2011: 6-5-0 J.C. Harper
2012: 5-6-0 J.C. Harper
2013: 3-9-0 J.C. Harper

and only 4 winning seasons in the last 11 years for the SFA football program.

What good thing did he have, to screw up?

More like maintaining the status quo.

[TheRevSFA]

I hope he's gone. I'll help him pack.

[Daytripper]

I hope he's gone. I'll help him pack.

Based on how well UCA is doing since he left, it appears he was holding them back.

[Catatonic]

Lamar at Nicholls​ Nicholls by 7
UCA at SFA UCA by 21
SLU at UIW SLU by 10
NWST at ACU ACU by 3
HBU at UTEP UTEP by 30
McNeese at SHSU Sam by 14

[MR. CHICKEN]

NICHOLLS STATE
CENTRAL ARKANSAS
SOUTHEAST LOUISIANA
ABILENE CHRISTIAN
UTEP
SAM HOUSTON STATE xcoolx

[BEAR]

Alright pickers..... first game is tonight....make your picks! xthumbsupx

[Daytripper]

Alright pickers..... first game is tonight....make your picks! xthumbsupx

I don't remember what I picked earlier in the thread, but I'm going to say Nicholls beats Lamar by 21 >>>>> 31-10

[BEAR]

Nicholls 35
Lamar 10
3:15 left in 4th quarter

[The Pud]

Nicholls is playing some good football

[blackfordpu]

Wow, how Lamar has tumbled. Such high expectations for his season.

Sent from my HTC One A9 using Tapatalk

[blackfordpu]

By the way, anyone want to adjust the mcneese vs Kats game after their HC made those comments?

Sent from my HTC One A9 using Tapatalk

[BEAR]

Nicholls 35
Lamar 10
Final


Great....we play a hot Nicholls team next. xrolleyesx

[Katfan]

Nicholls 35
Lamar 10
Final


Great....we play a hot Nicholls team next. xrolleyesx
Nichols is a good team, they have been a little up and down. Their d line is legit. But I don't think they will slow you guys down.

[Katfan]

Bear, based on the committee poll, do you think theirs a chance for both of our teams to get seeded?

[BEAR]

Bear, based on the committee poll, do you think theirs a chance for both of our teams to get seeded?

Great question. But I think the chance of that disappears when we play you guys. I don't think we will win the game so that will ruin our chances of getting seeded. If you lose the game by chance, you probably won't get a seed with your SOS and the loss to UCA. UCA would get a low seed at 10-1 from the Southland. IMO.

It really would have helped both of us if UCA had beaten a team they lost to by 26 last year. We statistically dominated Samford but two stats stood out. Turnovers and final score. The committee might have looked at our loss and saw nearly 600 yards offense, 36 first downs to 11, held them to -25 yards rushing...but lost and the committee might have thought UCA lost that one NOT that Samford won it. But I give credit to Samford, they won it.

[blackfordpu]

Great question. But I think the chance of that disappears when we play you guys. I don't think we will win the game so that will ruin our chances of getting seeded. If you lose the game by chance, you probably won't get a seed with your SOS and the loss to UCA. UCA would get a low seed at 10-1 from the Southland. IMO.

It really would have helped both of us if UCA had beaten a team they lost to by 26 last year. We statistically dominated Samford but two stats stood out. Turnovers and final score. The committee might have looked at our loss and saw nearly 600 yards offense, 36 first downs to 11, held them to -25 yards rushing...but lost and the committee might have thought UCA lost that one NOT that Samford won it. But I give credit to Samford, they won it.
Good gosh, how did the bears lose that game?

Sent from my HTC One A9 using Tapatalk

[Daytripper]

Nicholls 35
Lamar 10
Final


Great....we play a hot Nicholls team next. xrolleyesx

I predicted 31-10. I will take my bow now as I exit stage left.

[BEAR]

Good gosh, how did the bears lose that game?

Sent from my HTC One A9 using Tapatalk

It was strange:

First downs: UCA 36 Samford 11
Rushing: UCA 231 Samford -25
Passing: UCA 346 Samford 282
Total yds: UCA 577 Samford 257
Punt return yards average: UCA 7 Samford -3.5
Time of possession: UCA 36:46 Samford 23:14
Turnovers: UCA 1 Fumble, 1 INT which led to 2 scores for Samford. Samford- 1 fumble led to 0 points for UCA.
Total number of plays: UCA 115 Samford 56

Final score: Samford 35 UCA 29.
If we hadn't fumbled or thrown ONE of those INTs it's a win. But if "Ifs and buts were fruits and nuts..we'd all have a Merry Christmas". xlolx

[Hood]

To be fair to Lamar:

On the programs they gave out, the starting quarterback was not on the 2 deep depth chart (he was on the actual roster, just not on the two deep). They either had him under center or they put WR#7 under center in wildcat plays. One drive they started at the Nicholls 5. The center snapped two consecutive balls poorly, resulting in -40 yards in two downs.

Nicholls was clearly ON but Lamar apparently had a lot of injuries.

At one point in the 4th, presnap, two Lamar guys just dropped. No idea what that was about. The TV commentators might have had insight that the crowd was not made privy.

[BEAR]

To be fair to Lamar:
Nicholls was clearly ON but Lamar apparently had a lot of injuries.

I watched Lamar when they came to UCA. You are right, I watched 4 Lamar players walked off the field after injuries. They are a better team, just too beat up. No Harrington. QB was beat up. We dropped back into zone defense and they got some yardage. But overall it wasn't much of a game. Had they been healthy Lamar might be top 3 in our conference..maybe #2.

[The Pud]

To be fair to Lamar:

On the programs they gave out, the starting quarterback was not on the 2 deep depth chart (he was on the actual roster, just not on the two deep). They either had him under center or they put WR#7 under center in wildcat plays. One drive they started at the Nicholls 5. The center snapped two consecutive balls poorly, resulting in -40 yards in two downs.

Nicholls was clearly ON but Lamar apparently had a lot of injuries.

At one point in the 4th, presnap, two Lamar guys just dropped. No idea what that was about. The TV commentators might have had insight that the crowd was not made privy.


I watched this game online and I am even more impressed with teams from the Southland Conference. You guys can play some football down there!

[SFA 93]

Well thank you :D

[milleniumkat]

By the way, anyone want to adjust the mcneese vs Kats game after their HC made those comments?

Sent from my HTC One A9 using Tapatalk

man i'd love too....i just can't decide which way to go. I can see it both ways.


"I may already be inside you"

[The Pud]

By the way, anyone want to adjust the mcneese vs Kats game after their HC made those comments?

Sent from my HTC One A9 using Tapatalk

after those comments by McCheese St. Head Coach, I think KC (Keeler) & the Bunch throw up 70 points on them. Just a feeling.

[Daytripper]

I watched Lamar when they came to UCA. You are right, I watched 4 Lamar players walked off the field after injuries. They are a better team, just too beat up. No Harrington. QB was beat up. We dropped back into zone defense and they got some yardage. But overall it wasn't much of a game. Had they been healthy Lamar might be top 3 in our conference..maybe #2.

If Lamar ever gets their s#!t together they will be elite in the SLC. If they get a good coach who can recruit, they have enough oil money to out-do everybody in facilities.

[milleniumkat]

We won't have to wait fir uca to find out more about the Kats. I think Mcneese has underperformed and will bring it tonight. imho.


"I may already be inside you"

[Catatonic]

SLC pick em this year is like a T Ball league where they turn off the scoreboard and play just for fun, with no winners or losers declared at the end and everybody gets a snow cone.

[Katfan]

Great question. But I think the chance of that disappears when we play you guys. I don't think we will win the game so that will ruin our chances of getting seeded. If you lose the game by chance, you probably won't get a seed with your SOS and the loss to UCA. UCA would get a low seed at 10-1 from the Southland. IMO.

It really would have helped both of us if UCA had beaten a team they lost to by 26 last year. We statistically dominated Samford but two stats stood out. Turnovers and final score. The committee might have looked at our loss and saw nearly 600 yards offense, 36 first downs to 11, held them to -25 yards rushing...but lost and the committee might have thought UCA lost that one NOT that Samford won it. But I give credit to Samford, they won it.
What if? A couple of teams ahead of you lose, we both win this week and next in impressive fashion. We play a really great game which you pull out with a field goal to win by 1 point. If we both go into the game ranked in the top 8 and play a great game, seems like there's a small chance it could happen but your right, probably want. It's just that with only 2 teams in, I hate to see us have to play in the second round.

[milleniumkat]

Any McNeese posters going to be at the game today?


"I may already be inside you"

[TOOF]

Going out on a limb here...Bears will beat Sam xnodxxnodx

[Serpentor]

Any McNeese posters going to be at the game today?


"I may already be inside you"

Ran into a McNeese fan at a swap meet in Conroe today. Nice guy, he'll be at the game

[BEAR]

UCA fumbles on first play..SFA recovers and scores.
SFA 7
UCA 0
1st qrtr

[BEAR]

UCA 7
SFA 7

1st qtr. 5:42 left

[BEAR]

UCA 14
SFA 7
1st qtr 2:11 left

[Hood]

ESPN ran a graphic earlier comparing Lamar Jackson's stats to Lamar University. Not sure if that's worth a new thread. Also, if this is worth a new thread I don't know if this should be in FCS or other.

[BEAR]

UCA 14
SFA 14
Start of second quarter.

He k of a catch by Justice Liggins. One handed and from a deep pass. Conque has two TDs on short runs.

[BEAR]

UCA 21
SFA 14
11:21 left in 2nd quarter

UCA has 5 penalties for 56 yards already. xeyebrowx

Both teams have amassed 111 yards in penalties...its the first half.

[BEAR]

I'm hearing the word "backup" an awful lot in this game. xeyebrowx

How can the announcer say " UCA is seeing if the SFA defense is tired" when its the second quarter. They've got so much wrong with both these teams. xlolx

[BEAR]

Dropped TD right before half for UCA. xrolleyesx
Field goal UCA.

UCA 24
SFA 14
halftime

Ugly first half for both teams. UCA gets the ball to start the second half.

[McNeese72]

I will be on the sideline taking photos.

Doc

[BEAR]

Well if anyone was looking for offense in this game, nope. It resembles a game of follies.

Flags everywhere.

SFA is losing players left and right.

[BEAR]

Ugly. Just ugly. Bears had 4 red zone chances and came away with nothing.

UcA 31
SFA 10
4th qrtr. 10:20 left

[The Pud]

Sammy is pouring it on McNeese St. in the 1st half. The Pod is extremely impressed with Sammy's QB!

[TheRevSFA]

Sammy is pouring it on McNeese St. in the 1st half. The Pod is extremely impressed with Sammy's QB!

And you can see how much the Pod loves Sam on the Sam fansite

[The Pud]

And you can see how much the Pod loves Sam on the Sam fansite
xnodx

[milleniumkat]

This game with McNeese followed the exact same formula as every other game. Nothing new.

BUT...

This was the first game were the defense didn't just come out flat in the second, they got manhandled.

Now, i know keeler stated in the presser that that only had two active DB's the entire game due to injury and illness. Zero rest for a position built in rotation will have negative affects against a talented WR like Shelby and Batiste...

BUT

The middle of the defense did the worst job of tackling i've LITERALLY ever seen. I can handle the "pump the brakes" defense in the second half. But if they play like that again, it's going to be a quick playoffs

At the same time, this was our one legit bad game of the season, yet we never trailed, set school records and won by double digits vs a team that was ranked for 1/2 the year. We should get that corrected but who knows. maybe not.

At this point, we are a shootout or bust team imho.

At the same time, i'm really really glad that we got into a fight like that tonight with a game to go before UCA and playoffs. We needed a challenge and the Pokes finally gave us one. It makes me crazy, but that was a fun damn game.




"I may already be inside you"


"I may already be inside you"