PDA

View Full Version : Who is doing it "non fully funded"?


Brad82
February 13th, 2012, 08:12 PM
One of the issues that comes up regarding Rhody's challenges is: "Team X in region/conference is spending a lot of money/fully funded".

So,are any teams winning in FCS or making play-offs that one would classify as not being fully-funded or being slighted in terms of spending?

Are there any?

Not looking for a bunch of negativity,but some examples of teams that do "more with less".

Thanks.
DFW HOYA
February 13th, 2012, 08:15 PM
Many of the HBCU's are under the limit.
Dane96
February 13th, 2012, 08:25 PM
Albany, Central CT and Monmouth.

No need to look further.
401ks
February 13th, 2012, 08:59 PM
Albany, Central CT and Monmouth.

No need to look further.

xeyebrowx
Dane96
February 13th, 2012, 10:15 PM
As in teams who have been successful at playing up with less...and consistently.

I almost included Duquense...and frankly, should have. The Dukes are pretty much there I think...and with full NEC allotment, will be really good year in and year out.
citdog
February 13th, 2012, 11:18 PM
"I don't pay none of them Ho's"


Tampajag
kdinva
February 14th, 2012, 02:12 PM
I've heard that in a small number of seasons, Wofford has only about 56-58 grant equivalents on the roster......don't know if that is still the case......
Dane96
February 14th, 2012, 04:57 PM
Anyone who has over 56 or so rides is just fine.