I'm trying to follow the reasoning of people bashing the socon. It's just not there. You can say the second scheduling is weak, but the average socon team played a tougher schedule than at least 2 of the quarterfinalists (Colgate, Kennesaw State, maybe even Maine)
Put another way, if you're looking at the quality of the teams played and redacting the names of the teams and not worrying about whether those teams are within conferences or not, the socon is still tougher than a lot of bubble teams.
Mercer lost to Yale, but so did Maine by a much worse margin. The CAA gets a pass for that for some reason.
Looking at OOC against FCS, loss margin in parentheses)
ETSU 1-1 (JSU by 7)
Wofford 3-1 (KSU by 3)
Furman 0-1 (didn't show up against Elon, by 38)
Mercer 1-1 (Yale by 7)
Citadel 1-1 (Towson by 17)
Western Carolina 1-0
VMI 0-0
Chattanooga 2-0
Samford 0-1 (by 14)
So the only team that we lost to that didn't make the playoffs was Yale...who beat quarterfinalist Maine by much worse.
We are supposed to hold it against the socon for losing to teams that were pretty tough and beating teams handily as we should have. You can say we didn't get it done in some games this year, but we were 9-6 this year in OOC, 8-4 during the regular season.
Sent from my Pixel 2 using Tapatalk
Bookmarks