Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 19

Thread: Twenty Four

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    AGS FCS Master Saint3333's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    4,023

    Twenty Four

    This year is shaping up to become a good argument to expand the playoffs.

    Especially since 2 of the at-large bids might go to conferences without an auto-bid, Cal Poly and CCU (I still think some things need to happen, either JMU or SC State make the playoffs).

    I could name 3 teams from the A-10, SoCon, Gateway, Big Sky, and maybe the Southland that could win some playoff games. There's only 4-5 open spots for these 9-10 teams.

  2. #2
    Major FCS Ruler TxSt02's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Your Mom's Bed...
    Posts
    1,039
    I am somewhat new to the site here...

    How would a 24 team playoff be configured? I know they do it at the DII and DIII levels.

    Byes for 4 or 8 teams? Sorry I dont want to think to hard this sunday...

  3. #3
    Master FCS Advocate
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Posts
    302
    4 weeks of playoffs is enough. Stay at 16 teams.

  4. #4
    AGS FCS Master Saint3333's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Charlotte, NC
    Posts
    4,023
    Byes for the top 8 teams.

  5. #5
    FCS EGG-HOLE
    MR. CHICKEN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    My Team
    DELAWARE
    Location
    IT'S NEW-ARK NOT NEW-IRK...BRAWK!
    Posts
    24,273
    Quote Originally Posted by Saint3333
    Byes for the top 8 teams.

    AN' BYE BYES....TA 8 O' DUH REMAININ' 16!................BRAWK!

  6. #6
    I-AA OLD GUARD 89Hen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    28,490
    Quote Originally Posted by Saint3333
    This year is shaping up to become a good argument to expand the playoffs.
    I think this year is a good reason to shrink the playoffs. So many non-deserving teams will be in!

  7. #7
    AGS Resident APPhole AppGuy04's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Raleigh, NC
    Posts
    10,577
    Quote Originally Posted by 89Hen
    I think this year is a good reason to shrink the playoffs. So many non-deserving teams will be in!
    I would tend to agree

  8. #8
    On the Breast of Old South Mountain
    ngineer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    My Team
    Lehigh
    Location
    Lehigh Valley, PA
    Posts
    21,559
    Quote Originally Posted by 89Hen
    I think this year is a good reason to shrink the playoffs. So many non-deserving teams will be in!
    With everyone beating everyone, how do you determine what 'deserving' is?
    LEHIGH WILL SHINE TONIGHT, LEHIGH WILL SHINE!
    Patriot League Champions: 1993, 1995, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2004, 2006, 2010, 2011, 2016, 2017
    NCAA Playoff Appearances: D-II 1973, 1975, 1977 NCAA Champions
    D-IAA 1979 (Finalist), 1980, 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2004, 2010, 2011, 2016, 2017

  9. #9
    I-AA OLD GUARD 89Hen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    28,490
    Quote Originally Posted by ngineer
    With everyone beating everyone, how do you determine what 'deserving' is?
    Just saying there won't be any teams that have a real gripe IMO. There will be a slew of three+ loss teams that won't have a leg to stand on when complaining about not getting a bid.

  10. #10
    FCS Master
    Join Date
    Oct 2004
    Location
    Northern Virginia
    Posts
    2,127
    I'm strongly against expansion. It just reduces the overall quality of games and adds another week. Not a good idea.

Similar Threads

  1. CSN's FCS Recap: Twenty Photo Finishes
    By CSN-info in forum FCS Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: October 1st, 2008, 10:06 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •