Originally Posted by
mcveyrl
Actually, I found the article to be fairly objective. My issue was that SE posted it trying to show that somebody else had Jackson as a 1st rounder. But, bleacherreport.com is a "sign-up and write for us" type of site, so the content is amateur sportswriter generated. There were, by my count, about 10 mock drafts posted, none of which had Jackson at 29. I don't think that ER necessarily needed to point that out in his article, but a more direct link would've been helpful.
I stopped trying to find the mock draft he was referring to. I'm sure it's out there, but I couldn't find it.
I regret posting that about Coakley. In retrospect, it was kind of a cheap shot. I was using it to bash the credibility of the article, but the above paragraph was really the only point I was trying to get across.
Bookmarks