Page 3 of 13 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 21 to 30 of 126

Thread: Playoff expansion sooner rather than later?

  1. #21
    FCS Advocate professor8315's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    29

    Thumbs down Re: Playoff expansion sooner rather than later?

    Quote Originally Posted by Cleets View Post
    The only reason the playoff should expand is if there has been consistently (year after year) a legitimate contender ranked below 20th in the polls
    and I just don't see that - in fact I don't really see a contender ranked below 16th

    Side Note:
    however, it was pointed out to me that this expansion would allow for all 12 of the CAA teams to be given a playoff game every year
    and I think that's something we've all been looking forward to



    With that mindset let's go back to a 8 team playoff.....

  2. #22
    FCS Advocate professor8315's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    South Carolina
    Posts
    29

    Re: Playoff expansion sooner rather than later?

    Playoff expansion is a great ideal. In the lower divisions (D2 has 24 teams playoff and D3 has 32) larger field works. I would like to see that the playoff committee to start the first round two weeks later. This wil allow conferences with 12 or more football members to have a champinionship game.

  3. #23
    AGS FCS Champion
    RabidRabbit's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    My Team
    South Dakota State
    Location
    North DFW. Hosting FCS champs and parties
    Posts
    6,554

    Re: Playoff expansion sooner rather than later?

    Quote Originally Posted by MplsBison View Post
    No auto-bids to conferences whose teams do not give money to football players solely because they're football players (need based or otherwise).

    My foot's down on this one. Four more at-large or nothing.


    FCS is DI football, not DIII football.


    You drawing a line in the sand for the NCAA to follow? Kudos on a fabulous line!

    I'm all set the go out and stop that meteor!

    Ivy and SWAC or Pioneer, the more the FCS level teams participate in the play-off system, rather than do their own thang, is an improvement.
    Rabid Rabbit

    Rabbits will smack you in the face, knock you down, help you up and do it all over again - McNeese75

  4. #24
    AGS World Heavyweight Champion
    superman7515's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    My Team
    Bobby Heenan School of Broadcast Journalism
    Location
    Parts Unknown
    Posts
    9,550

    Re: Playoff expansion sooner rather than later?

    Quote Originally Posted by professor8315 View Post
    Playoff expansion is a great ideal. In the lower divisions (D2 has 24 teams playoff and D3 has 32) larger field works.
    Yes but there are more teams in D2 and D3, so there's actually a larger percentage of FCS teams in the playoffs than in D3 and the same as in D2.
    FCS = 126 teams with a 20 team playoff for 16% of teams making the playoffs
    D2 = 151 teams with a 24 team playoff for 16% of teams making the playoffs
    D3 = 239 teams with a 32 team playoff for 13% of teams making the playoffs
    University of Delaware: Cop Free Since 1743
    Brock Free Since 10-16
    Lunch by invitation only

  5. #25
    I-AA OLD GUARD 89Hen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    28,490

    Re: Playoff expansion sooner rather than later?

    The fact that the Hens were in the discussion for a playoff spot this year tells you that no expansion is needed.

  6. #26
    FCS Expert uni88's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    My Team
    Northern Iowa
    Location
    On the foggy woggy banks
    Posts
    2,600

    Re: Playoff expansion sooner rather than later?

    Quote Originally Posted by professor8315 View Post
    Playoff expansion is a great ideal. In the lower divisions (D2 has 24 teams playoff and D3 has 32) larger field works. I would like to see that the playoff committee to start the first round two weeks later. This wil allow conferences with 12 or more football members to have a champinionship game.
    So you could play an 11 game season, play a conference championship game, make a 24 team playoff without a first round bye and advances to the championship. That's a potential 17 game season. Moving the first round back a week gives everyone 2 weeks between games (and the top 8 teams 3 weeks) and shrinks the time between the semi's and the NC to 2 weeks.

    The NCAA isn't going to expand the playoffs for money. There isn't a lot of money in the FCS playoffs, they'll expand them because of the perception of them being unfair to the Pioneer and any other league that wants in. The NCAA worries about money, but they also worry about public opinion.

  7. #27
    FCS Champion asumike83's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    Pineville, NC
    Posts
    3,711

    Re: Playoff expansion sooner rather than later?

    It will all come down to what is more profitable for the NCAA but I would be opposed to it. The field does not need to be watered down any further, I think 16 teams was perfect.
    "It's not whether you get knocked down, it's whether you get up."
    -Vince Lombardi

  8. #28
    AGS FCS Champion Lehigh Football Nation's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Murray Goodman Stadium
    Posts
    22,612

    Re: Playoff expansion sooner rather than later?

    Quote Originally Posted by 89Hen View Post
    The fact that the Hens were in the discussion for a playoff spot this year tells you that no expansion is needed.
    By whom?
    Follow me on Twitter (User Name LFN)

    The
    Time
    Is
    Now

  9. #29
    I'm no better than you...probably
    ursus arctos horribilis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    My Team
    Montana
    Posts
    29,297

    Re: Playoff expansion sooner rather than later?

    I don't really remember Delaware as a viable candidate once they could'nt reach the 7 either, much like Montana was not last year. Sure the fans like to pipe dream (not talking about 89 there) and I even heard the Delaware TV guys talking about the possibility after it was clear they wouldn't get 7 but I just figured they were trying to keep fan interest high.

  10. #30
    AGS FCS Champion
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    13,617

    Re: Playoff expansion sooner rather than later?

    Quote Originally Posted by Dane96 View Post
    Jack Juice-

    1. The Ivies have completely flipped because of something that happened with Tommy Amaker recruiting at Harvard.
    2. Some other Ivies have been doing what I stated for years.
    3. I was good enough in another sport to be recruited by an Ivy...and I was offered cash even though my parents combined income was well above the level limits that would have allowed me to receive aid if I had been a regular student. This was at Princeton.

    That said, go review the new Ivy model for aid...and STFU until you do so.
    Come on dude. You knew exactly what I meant. Knew exactly that I was right. And you give me this crap???


    AS I SAID -- Ivy schools do not, DO NOT, give money to football players that only those football players can get.

Similar Threads

  1. FCS Playoff Expansion to 24???
    By GeauxLions94 in forum FCS Discussion
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: August 5th, 2011, 04:46 PM
  2. Why FCS Playoff Expansion is Right
    By gophoenix in forum FCS Discussion
    Replies: 100
    Last Post: May 13th, 2008, 09:28 PM
  3. FCS Playoff expansion set for 2010
    By CCU97 in forum FCS Discussion
    Replies: 123
    Last Post: May 1st, 2008, 11:49 AM
  4. Playoff expansion?
    By GSU Eagle in forum FCS Discussion
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: November 19th, 2007, 01:23 PM
  5. FCS expansion of playoff field unlikely in ’08 (T-FP)
    By chattanoogamocs in forum FCS Discussion
    Replies: 193
    Last Post: October 20th, 2007, 01:11 PM

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •