Search:

Well if a backup QB is worth 3 scores then you still lost by 3 scores.

Didn't Elon beat you by 40?

Well the current trend for both of them can be summed up in one sentence:

The only win between the two of them since September is Idaho.

No.

I don't think a 4 loss Montana or MNST gets in. Both of their "big" wins came wayyy early in the season and they haven't done much since.

7-4 Big Sky teams haven't had much luck getting in lately....

Who is better? 7-4 McNeese or 6-5 WIU?

I think 6-5 UNI has a better case than a lot of 7-4 teams would. I was also counting ISUr in the "6-5" category because of the non-d1 though they would technically be 6-4. It wouldn't surprise me...

I wasn't sure about if they would or not. It shouldn't make a big difference for the At-larges though so I didn't really bother to look.

Google it. You might learn something.

I'll give you a hint:
Rabbits, Penguins, Birds, Trees, Cats, Bears, and Dogs don't have hooves.

Yup. The SoCon will be the one to watch down the stretch. Plus, like I mentioned, McNeese and FAMU losing could open up spots as well.

Touching.

This is a breakdown of likely # of at-larges per conference.

Auto-Bids (based off right now): 10 spots
Big Sky- UC Davis
Big South- Kennesaw
CAA- Delaware
MVFC- Ungulates
NEC- Sacred Heart...