Bump
Printable View
Bump
1) Cal Poly - 3.5 wins UNDER
2) Eastern Washington - 9.5 wins OVER
3) Idaho - 6.5 wins OVER
4) Idaho State - 2.5 wins OVER
5) Montana - 8.5 wins UNDER
6) Montana State - 4.5 wins OVER
7) Northern Arizona - 7.5 wins OVER
8) Northern Colorado - 4.5 wins OVER
9) Portland State - 1.5 wins OVER
10) Sacramento State - 5.5 wins UNDER
11) Southern Utah - 7.5 wins UNDER
12) UC Davis - 3.5 wins OVER
13) Weber State - 8.5 wins OVER
Thanks Supe!!!
1) Cal Poly - 3.5 wins UNDER
2) Eastern Washington - 9.5 wins OVER
3) Idaho - 6.5 wins OVER
4) Idaho State - 2.5 wins UNDER
5) Montana - 8.5 wins UNDER
6) Montana State - 4.5 wins OVER
7) Northern Arizona - 7.5 wins UNDER
8) Northern Colorado - 4.5 wins OVER
9) Portland State - 1.5 wins OVER
10) Sacramento State - 5.5 wins OVER
11) Southern Utah - 7.5 wins UNDER
12) UC Davis - 3.5 wins OVER
13) Weber State - 8.5 wins OVER
I don't think I will get this right for a couple of years. I am intrigued by anyone that puts under, or over, for Idaho since we don't yet know how our players will adapt to the offense and defense from the BSC. We have been recruiting, training and playing against Sun Belt teams and this change could be so great that it might take a few years of recruiting to adapt to the current style of play with the right schemes, players and coaches.
Think of any of the teams that switched conferences. It took a while.
I guess I will ask here. What is going on with the BigSkyFans.com website? I haven't been able to get on it today and keep getting an Error 526 message.
Doc
Egriz seems to be having the same problem. The forums work if you go there directly, though http://www.egriz.com/grizboard/index.php
1) Cal Poly - 3.5 wins UNDER
2) Eastern Washington - 9.5 wins UNDER
3) Idaho - 6.5 wins OVER
4) Idaho State - 2.5 wins OVER
5) Montana - 8.5 wins UNDER
6) Montana State - 4.5 wins OVER
7) Northern Arizona - 7.5 wins UNDER
8) Northern Colorado - 4.5 wins UNDER
9) Portland State - 1.5 wins UNDER
10) Sacramento State - 5.5 wins OVER
11) Southern Utah - 7.5 wins UNDER
12) UC Davis - 3.5 wins OVER
13) Weber State - 8.5 wins OVER
I thought this was an interesting article. It seems Mr. Groomes has similar questions/concerns about the Big Sky's 'interesting' schedule as FUBeAR does...
http://www.collegesportsmadness.com/article/16337
FCS'S MISSING CONFERENCE MATCH-UPS
Big Sky
- Eastern Washington vs. Montana
- Eastern Washington vs. Sacramento State
- Idaho vs. Northern Arizona
- Idaho vs. Sacramento State
- Idaho vs. Weber State
- Montana vs. Sacramento State
- Montana vs. Weber State
- Montana State vs. Northern Arizona
- Montana State vs. Sacramento State
- Montana State vs. UC Davis
- UC Davis vs. Weber State
Wow! Right off the bat, there’s eleven games that many of the Big Sky’s contenders will not be playing. In fact, there’s a twelfth between Eastern Washington and Northern Arizona, but they will actually compete in a “non-conference” match-up. With the Big Sky being the FCS’ largest conference, both in geographic size and by number of teams, these things happen. On top of each playing eight conference opponents, a fourteenth team, North Dakota, is a lame duck conference member that cannot win the league’s automatic, but who’s games will still count in the standings for everyone else. Idaho is dropping down from FBS football back into the Big Sky after 22 years, but will miss three of the other main contenders in 2018. Upstarts Sacramento State and UC Davis are looking to make the leap into the big boy conversation, but each misses multiple opportunities to make statements. The Eastern Washington/Montana/Northern Arizona triangle of top contenders all miss each other, at least in official conference action. And each of them could be favored to win every conference game they play, opening the potential for tri-champions all going 8-0. That would be interesting!