PDA

View Full Version : Stat Preview #3 = Colonial Athletic Assn



Keeper
February 24th, 2008, 11:33 PM
Every Sunday look for new posting of a conference comparison.
This is a thumbnail compilation of final stats and subtracting those
of roster departures due to graduation, eligibility, etc. Should
provide a quick sketch of returning talent vs conference foes.

RYPG = 2007 rushing yards per game
PYPG = 2007 passing yards per game
SR-RB = subtracted yards per game for roster departures
SR-QB = ditto
SR-WR = ditto
SR-OL = equivalent number of off-linemen departed based on
.. number of games played, not including long snappers if known
SR-D = percentage of defensive talent departed based on top 15 tacklers


### RYPG SR-RB PYPG SR-QB SR-WR SR-OL SR-D
Hof 145.9 89.6 242.5 0.0 119.8 2.00 77%
ME 178.7 8.7 127.0 0.0 19.3 1.82 25%
MA 153.2 126.7 248.3 0.0 209.9 2.46 36%
NH 130.0 43.7 277.3 251.4 78.3 1.83 34%
NU 166.5 129.2 156.3 0.0 6.1 1.00 40%
URI 229.9 36.7 118.0 0.2 10.9 1.82 55%
Del 171.1 131.1 289.5 284.2 36.9 3.47 13%
JMU 265.1 76.6 144.9 0.0 43.2 0.00 47%
Rich 234.6 137.4 170.8 0.0 25.2 1.07 23%
Tow 68.5 58.0 235.5 0.0 119.8 1.91 57%
Nova 154.0 0.0 172.1 0.0 72.9 0.18 17%
W&M 118.1 18.8 278.1 22.3 61.7 2.64 9%
Who do you see as the most improved teams this season?

UNHWildCats
February 25th, 2008, 12:05 AM
...Its monday here:p

Keeper
February 25th, 2008, 01:22 AM
Busy weekend 'Cat. Got it in just in time West Coast.
Ya got 6 more days to shoot holes thru it before #4 comes out.

Tribe4SF
February 25th, 2008, 02:54 AM
Most improved should be Maine and W&M.

Hoyadestroya85
February 25th, 2008, 02:56 AM
I gather a few things from that, JMU Will Be very solid next year, That New Delaware QB better be ready to fill some pretty big shoes, and Villanova Seems set next year.. given the relatively little production that we lose..
I agree that W&M should improve a lot, but I don't know how much i can agree with the idea about Maine..
They should have Beaten us last year with our biggest crowd of the year though

Ram Ball
February 26th, 2008, 05:33 PM
RHODY!!

jmuroller
February 26th, 2008, 09:15 PM
Stats like these are so worthless. A school could have 22 starters coming back, but if they went 0-11, then the best thing that probably could have happened for them if for everyone to graduate. Every runner could be coming back, but if they are slow and fumble all the time, good luck. Some schools will lose alot, but there backups are better than most of the returning starters on other teams. Worthless stats if you ask me.

Keeper
February 27th, 2008, 05:18 AM
Stats like these are so worthless. A school could have 22 starters coming back, but if they went 0-11, then the best thing that probably could have happened for them if for everyone to graduate. Every runner could be coming back, but if they are slow and fumble all the time, good luck. Some schools will lose alot, but there backups are better than most of the returning starters on other teams. Worthless stats if you ask me.

You're Welcome !
xpeacex

Tribe4SF
February 27th, 2008, 06:35 AM
Any stat that implies anything remotely negative about JMU (47% of defensive production) is, of course, worthless.xrolleyesx Who needs a four-time all-american at safety who ran the D throughout their rise?

andy7171
February 27th, 2008, 07:27 AM
Any stat that implies anything remotely negative about JMU (47% of defensive production) is, of course, worthless.xrolleyesx Who needs a four-time all-american at safety who ran the D throughout their rise?

xthumbsupx Which reminds me is he getting any NFL looks?

Tribe4SF
February 27th, 2008, 07:38 AM
I'm sure he'll get a shot. Reminds me of the situation when Mark Kelso came out of W&M. Didn't have everything scouts wanted, but made a nice career with the Bills. Lezotte's a winner, and I'm betting he sticks somewhere.